For the Defense (1930) presents
a gritty Depression-era drama, but very much on the cusp of the 1920s “era of
wonderful nonsense” and a semi-biographical take on one of its outrageous
characters. It is grim, fatalistic, but
with that cheeky spark of chip-on-the-shoulder humor that marked the character
needed to survive the Great Depression, and which we see abundantly in films of
this era.
William
Powell stars as a clever, charming, hard-drinking New York attorney whose
tactics sometimes actually skirt legality.
He is immaculately dressed and performs in court with Shakespearean
flourish, never loses a case, but he is flawed, and eventually must suffer the
consequences. Despite his eventual
downfall, he is not, however, a tragic figure in the sense that he is the
master of his own destiny. He gambles
with his clients’ lives, with his own, and refuses to take life on anything but
his own terms. No hero, but we can’t
help but smile at his success, particularly during a long-played out courtroom
scene where he takes a vial of nitroglycerin that is a piece of evidence and
smashes it on the floor to the horror of everyone. He knows it is not really nitroglycerin (and
so do we, as the scene telegraphs that to us beforehand). His greatest courtroom trick, however, is his
bribing of juries.
Far
more shocking than the nitro scene, at least to modern sensibilities, perhaps,
is Powell’s self-destructive drunkenness.
It is not played for comic effect, despite his wisecracks. The real ugliness of the drunkenness is its treatment
as being normal, being necessary to fuel the engine of a driven man.
More
tragic, perhaps, is the character played by Kay Francis, who loves Powell and
wants to marry him, but his uncomfortable, gentle response is, “After all these
months, don't you think that would be rather silly?” He clearly loves her, but it’s a slap in the
face, and we feel her humiliation.
Kay
Francis, who would go on the make six films with Mr. Powell in all, plays an
actress, and her flapper’s severely short bob make her look more devil-may-care
than Powell in his conservative three-piece-suits, though she is far more
traditional, at least as regards her feelings about marriage. She really looks startlingly modern compared to
Powell and stands out in appearance from the Depression-bedraggled cast, as if
she hasn’t gotten the memo that the 1920s are over.
Obviously,
noting their relationship, the drinking, and Powell’s clever flouting of the
law, we are distinctly in Pre-Code era, unrepentant and blasé about rules. It’s also a marvel to note that Mr. Powell’s
screen presence is magnetic and, unlike his cast mates, really quite
natural. Even Kay Francis, who had a
strong screen presence, comes off as extremely mannered in performance compared
to the smooth William Powell, who never plays to the camera, and seems not to
know there’s a camera in the room.
The
plot takes us from Powell’s many victories in the courtroom getting criminals
off, to a tragedy when one of Kay’s admirers, played by Scott Kolk, tries to
lure her away from Powell by proposing marriage. Kay and Kolk get into a car accident which
kills a pedestrian, and Kolk goes on trial, though Kay was driving. He tries to protect her, and Kay tries to
keep her involvement with him a secret from Powell, knowing he will never
forgive her for being out with his rival.
Powell refers to Kolk as her raccoon coat, because that is what he
wears—more shades of the previous decade.
Their scenes in a speakeasy also flout the law, and remind us that
Prohibition was not repealed until 1933.
Powell
will lose his first case, and find himself shipped to Sing-Sing for his
chicanery , but the sordid tale ends on a note of hope when Kay promises to
wait for him. He promises to marry her,
if she does.
Director
John Cromwell gives us a lean and strong, quickly shot story. Look for him also in a bit part as a
reporter. The dogged district attorney
is played by William B. Davidson. Also
popping up in the cast is George “Gabby” Hayes as a waiter.
There
is a sense—I wonder if it was perceived even when this film played in
theaters—that we were stuck treading water in a period of time where one era
was finished, but the new one had not yet acquired a personality of its
own. We were waiting warily to be
introduced. Rather than a sense of
foreboding, there was a only a weak smile and a shrug of the shoulders. We hadn’t touched bottom yet as a society; we
were still in the freefall, waiting to land.
***
Come
back next Thursday when we shift gears to an era of another kind of anxiety but
a greater message of comfort – the gentle wartime home front story of Happy Land (1943) starring Don Ameche.
*********************
The audio book for Ann Blyth: Actress. Singer. Star. is now for sale on Audible.com, and on Amazon and iTunes.
The audio book for Ann Blyth: Actress. Singer. Star. is now for sale on Audible.com, and on Amazon and iTunes.
Also in paperback and eBook from Amazon.
4 comments:
When I wrote about Powell a couple of years ago, I watched some of his early stuff, and I had noticed for the first time how much of an edge his 30s characters usually had. It was as if they were variations on MY MAN GODFREY: rogues from the street playing at being gentlemen. That's how it seemed to me, anyway.
Hi, Rich. Yes, I suppose many of his early characters were cut from the same cloth, though this role is more rogue than gentleman. He certainly did have a talent for bringing out both sides.
Love your description of Powell's performance as if he didn't know there was a camera in the room. He really is a unique and watchable actor. I'll have to add this to my "lawyer movie" list. Maybe one day I'll divide them into decades, and won't know where to place this one.
Thanks, CW. Lawyer movie list, I like that. Has anyone ever held a courtroom movie blogathon? I like courtroom dramas.
Post a Comment